It is usual for most of us to get fresh water any time we need. A plain glass of water, seems to be most basic action at no monetary cost. We have not realized yet that such a simple need ,is also in danger of become very expensive. Would anyone imagine taking water pills?.
2500 scientist, politicians , and delegates from 140 countries ,are debating about the rational use of water. Rotarians ara also very active about this issue. Despite the fact that society is becoming a knowledge society, it lacks basic understanding about the proper use of water resources. 97,5% of the water available in the whole planet ,is too salty to be suitable for human consumption, and only 0,26% of water for human consumption is accessible for such a purpose ,because the rest of it, either it is on the poles, or deep underneath the earth.250 rivers ,some of them trans frontiers, cover 40 % of world water demand. Thus , It seems feasible and not far away the chance that water might become a source of conflict, just as it has become oil.-
On the other side, 1200 million people, 20% of world population ,lacks sufficient water supply.200 million get diseases close related to shortage of good quality water ,and 3 to 4 million people die because of that. Besides, 6000 children (part of world human capital)die because of the same reason .All of this means a very high social cost for wasteful water consumption, so high in comparison with private cost( almost zero),that a feasible alternative to improve the rationality of our daily water consumption pattern, might turn out to be a proportional tax: the more water people consume the higher the tax, to induce more efficiency in the use of this increasingly scarce resource. It is a paradox, that a tax ,supposedly inefficient, would comes out to solve an inefficiency. Of course ,It all depend about the purpose and the expected outcome.
Although I do not like too much taxes, this one can be unavoidable, because it is the way to solve what otherwise would imply very transaction cost ,given the fact that there is not clearly defined property right ,on the current sources of water. Therefore, as a matter of fact nobody (scientific asides),cares about the over consumption!.
In Latin America, 125 million people live without proper water networks which affects the quality of life couple with health and sanitary conditions. It follows ,that those people who lacks water, get diseases which are a kind of avoidable ones. These diseases, competes with other normal diseases arising among the population, pressing and increasing the demand for public health, to such extent that it fails to cope with the expectations in terms of quality and scope. Some people do not get public health attention. There is some research available, whose results are very clear: for every (1)euro spent on better water facilities, it is possible to save cost up to 34 euro, because of lower demand for public health .-
On average , consumers use up to 125 lts daily of water , but we are not paying the real cost of such consumption, which become higher for those who get higher levels of water consumption . So , what is it the real cost of a glass of water?. Guessing hardly less, than 35 euro!.
Saturday, August 23, 2008
Saturday, August 09, 2008
Doha Trade negotiations talks
The evaluation of the recent Doha Free Trade talks outcomes , the winners are: Governments, farmers, Protectionism policies support. Among the losers are: agricultural exporting countries, less developed countries, industry, services, and cotton producers. Thus, at first glance it seemed that the chances for account that the cost of failure(more losers) was higher than its benefits(less winners). Maybe a lot of the expectation about the Doha talk, has been driven by such cost- benefit failure analysis, measured by those directly involved in the issue. In other words, key sector of global economies, and key emerging economies trying to get over their differences about trade, with good chances for getting an agreement.
However, the real measure for evaluating this 2008 Doha Round incentives, should be the impact on global economy as a whole. On that regard, a positive result of this last round ,implied annual windfall of U$$50 billion to the global economy, plus U$$ 100 billion(over a ten year period),because of tariff reduction. What is the meaning of these numbers? .Actually, World economy GDP is about U$$ 50 trillion. Therefore, the global economic benefits of any accord,(roughly around 1% of global GDP in a span of ten years),was not higher enough over its cost, which it was to keep things the way they are, with global trade (tariffs for poor country exports are 3%),and resources mobility, giving opportunities to all, although to a less extent agricultural product . Thus, there was not strong economic incentives to go further on with negotiations , based on deeper mutual concessions.
On the other side, it is the relevant issue stated by public choice theorist, which emphasizes the lower transaction cost of small homogeneous groups to join themselves around common goals(the previously defined as the winners), related with the higher transaction cost facing the larger heterogeneous groups (previously defined as the losers),which it made a lot more complex the process of negotiations ,because of the election time in USA ,and opinion polls tracking Government performance both in Europe and USA, in time of economic slowdown. Thus, the timing was not free of political pressure, for critical points. The implications are both: a.-Future negotiations would be better based on small groups, sharing common interest dealing with problem of high impact on their own economies. b.- The political background with more big players on the negotiation table, suggest a tougher path ahead ,for agreements at a global scale.
However, the real measure for evaluating this 2008 Doha Round incentives, should be the impact on global economy as a whole. On that regard, a positive result of this last round ,implied annual windfall of U$$50 billion to the global economy, plus U$$ 100 billion(over a ten year period),because of tariff reduction. What is the meaning of these numbers? .Actually, World economy GDP is about U$$ 50 trillion. Therefore, the global economic benefits of any accord,(roughly around 1% of global GDP in a span of ten years),was not higher enough over its cost, which it was to keep things the way they are, with global trade (tariffs for poor country exports are 3%),and resources mobility, giving opportunities to all, although to a less extent agricultural product . Thus, there was not strong economic incentives to go further on with negotiations , based on deeper mutual concessions.
On the other side, it is the relevant issue stated by public choice theorist, which emphasizes the lower transaction cost of small homogeneous groups to join themselves around common goals(the previously defined as the winners), related with the higher transaction cost facing the larger heterogeneous groups (previously defined as the losers),which it made a lot more complex the process of negotiations ,because of the election time in USA ,and opinion polls tracking Government performance both in Europe and USA, in time of economic slowdown. Thus, the timing was not free of political pressure, for critical points. The implications are both: a.-Future negotiations would be better based on small groups, sharing common interest dealing with problem of high impact on their own economies. b.- The political background with more big players on the negotiation table, suggest a tougher path ahead ,for agreements at a global scale.
Saturday, July 19, 2008
The economics approach of new European immigration policy (II)
Why do people emigrate ?. There are some key non economics factors which explain migration flows. Let take a look at them:
v Social factors. It refers to the desire of migrants to break away from domestic constraint whatever they might be.
v Cultural factors, It includes the safety net provide in most advanced countries, which give a better sense of protection and better living standard than the one they have at home countries.
v Physical factors .Recent migration from south China because of flooding, is an example of migrations flows due to natural disasters .
v Transportation facilities. It is easier to travel now than what it was before.
Following the Todaro ´s model (Economic Development in the third world .Second edition 1981),there is also an economic explanation for migration flows. People do migrate because of expected earnings, between sectors in domestic economy. This expected earnings, are measured by the difference in real incomes among different sectors, and the probability of a new migrant of obtaining an urban job at his destination point .Thus ,the model explains rural urban- migration, regional migration ,and it can also be applied to international migration.
International migration above a certain level of natural flows due to transitory causes(relatives who goes back to their own countries ,and the like),could be hypothesized as the outcome of wrong designed domestic policies , as long as the income gap is wide enough against domestic work places. In such a case People will look foreign work places, even with imperfect information or without information at all, about the probability of finding a job. The perception of that income gap to be permanent, will induce people to take riskier actions, because the expected benefit, is perceived to be higher than the current permanent cost .
In short ,migration can be explained by rational considerations related to benefits and cost, mostly financial, but also psychological. It follows that better domestic policies, would decreases the benesfit of migration .But what are the incentives for such a better policies?.Moral hazard and free ride for policy makers, applied fully when the destination countries do not take actions aimed to decreased such a benefit of migration which includes the legal framework and immigration policies.
To make the argument clear, in a global economy migration flows are a necessary condition to complement capital flow specially the services arising from those high skilled worker, which is the kind of migration with positive externalities for the host countries , and the one they prefer most. The problem is with the migration flows of both low skilled and illegal migrants, which becomes a competitors with domestic citizens for social benefits.In this case ,low skilled immigration flows are linked to negative externalities,which market forces can not solve because it fails to define the property right of domestic jobs.Therefore ,it is necessary for governments to step in,like in any other case of such externalities.It follows that the real issue should not be the new European immigration policy,but the new seeting which it imply ,for those countries which depended on former facilites to migrants, such that they should start to improve the design of domestic policy, heavely focused on redistribution and less on economic growth.
v Social factors. It refers to the desire of migrants to break away from domestic constraint whatever they might be.
v Cultural factors, It includes the safety net provide in most advanced countries, which give a better sense of protection and better living standard than the one they have at home countries.
v Physical factors .Recent migration from south China because of flooding, is an example of migrations flows due to natural disasters .
v Transportation facilities. It is easier to travel now than what it was before.
Following the Todaro ´s model (Economic Development in the third world .Second edition 1981),there is also an economic explanation for migration flows. People do migrate because of expected earnings, between sectors in domestic economy. This expected earnings, are measured by the difference in real incomes among different sectors, and the probability of a new migrant of obtaining an urban job at his destination point .Thus ,the model explains rural urban- migration, regional migration ,and it can also be applied to international migration.
International migration above a certain level of natural flows due to transitory causes(relatives who goes back to their own countries ,and the like),could be hypothesized as the outcome of wrong designed domestic policies , as long as the income gap is wide enough against domestic work places. In such a case People will look foreign work places, even with imperfect information or without information at all, about the probability of finding a job. The perception of that income gap to be permanent, will induce people to take riskier actions, because the expected benefit, is perceived to be higher than the current permanent cost .
In short ,migration can be explained by rational considerations related to benefits and cost, mostly financial, but also psychological. It follows that better domestic policies, would decreases the benesfit of migration .But what are the incentives for such a better policies?.Moral hazard and free ride for policy makers, applied fully when the destination countries do not take actions aimed to decreased such a benefit of migration which includes the legal framework and immigration policies.
To make the argument clear, in a global economy migration flows are a necessary condition to complement capital flow specially the services arising from those high skilled worker, which is the kind of migration with positive externalities for the host countries , and the one they prefer most. The problem is with the migration flows of both low skilled and illegal migrants, which becomes a competitors with domestic citizens for social benefits.In this case ,low skilled immigration flows are linked to negative externalities,which market forces can not solve because it fails to define the property right of domestic jobs.Therefore ,it is necessary for governments to step in,like in any other case of such externalities.It follows that the real issue should not be the new European immigration policy,but the new seeting which it imply ,for those countries which depended on former facilites to migrants, such that they should start to improve the design of domestic policy, heavely focused on redistribution and less on economic growth.
Friday, July 04, 2008
The economic approach of New Immigration policy in Europe (I)
Although Latin America Immigrants are not a key variable of the problem,(8 million of illegal immigrant in Europe),it has been quite a shock for policy makers in Latin America, the new immigration policy framework, set by European authorities mostly concerned to both North African, and eastern Europeans illegal flows. However, Latin America immigrants in Europe represent a good source of foreign income through remittances, which in some Andean countries might be meaningful .
History teach us, the value added by immigrants to the land they arrive. Latin America itself is a continent made of immigrants(Germans, Japanese, Italians, French, Portuguese, Koreans ,Jews and others ethnical groups, were a constant flow from Europe to Latin America since the eighteen (in some cases even before) up to the twenty century). The economics to justify for such immigrants flow was clear, the expected economic benefit on their new land, were much higher than the cost involved to settle them down . Much of them, helped to create and consolidate new countries. Somehow, Latin America benefited from European nations ,as much as those immigrants improved its fragile initial human capital endowment .
However, even with those additional better qualified human resources ,and quite on the opposite to others successful immigration experiences, wrong domestic policy design in the twenty century, lead to higher poverty (40% of Population) and inequality (the worst income distribution in the world),in Latin America, such that migration to different places out of the continent,could be considered a natural consequence of such failures.
Thus, the first issue to be addressed, is that such a migration represent the failure of domestic policies. It is not efficient to design domestic policies, with such an “implicit guarantee” that if something goes wrong, there are plenty of “volunteers countries ” to cope with the failure, instead of the domestic policy designers, who would get a free ride. Both, Moral hazard and free ride , would lead to endless flows of immigrants to host countries.
A second implication would be that Latin America would become a poverty exporter continent . In such a case, the real cost of immigrants for host countries , is much higher than the expected benefit.
It is not the best qualified resource who seek new opportunities, which creates the problem ,but those who heavily depend on social policies, which turns out to be competitors with local citizens needs ,which feel they are left behind in time of trouble. A different matter, is the implementation of the reform, which no matter the timing, should also take into account humanitarian criteria when it applied.
History teach us, the value added by immigrants to the land they arrive. Latin America itself is a continent made of immigrants(Germans, Japanese, Italians, French, Portuguese, Koreans ,Jews and others ethnical groups, were a constant flow from Europe to Latin America since the eighteen (in some cases even before) up to the twenty century). The economics to justify for such immigrants flow was clear, the expected economic benefit on their new land, were much higher than the cost involved to settle them down . Much of them, helped to create and consolidate new countries. Somehow, Latin America benefited from European nations ,as much as those immigrants improved its fragile initial human capital endowment .
However, even with those additional better qualified human resources ,and quite on the opposite to others successful immigration experiences, wrong domestic policy design in the twenty century, lead to higher poverty (40% of Population) and inequality (the worst income distribution in the world),in Latin America, such that migration to different places out of the continent,could be considered a natural consequence of such failures.
Thus, the first issue to be addressed, is that such a migration represent the failure of domestic policies. It is not efficient to design domestic policies, with such an “implicit guarantee” that if something goes wrong, there are plenty of “volunteers countries ” to cope with the failure, instead of the domestic policy designers, who would get a free ride. Both, Moral hazard and free ride , would lead to endless flows of immigrants to host countries.
A second implication would be that Latin America would become a poverty exporter continent . In such a case, the real cost of immigrants for host countries , is much higher than the expected benefit.
It is not the best qualified resource who seek new opportunities, which creates the problem ,but those who heavily depend on social policies, which turns out to be competitors with local citizens needs ,which feel they are left behind in time of trouble. A different matter, is the implementation of the reform, which no matter the timing, should also take into account humanitarian criteria when it applied.
Friday, June 20, 2008
Environment protection and private incentives
It is usual to read comments concerning the environment conservation ,concerning the way people should behave or feel ,in such a way that the positive externality of either behavior or feelings , turns out to be an higher self consciousness when it comes to deal with the challenge of improving our understanding about environment.
Most of the key players on the issue, agree that it is crucial to keeping the pace on environment conservation ,with no further delay, specially at the level of government level policy design. However, individual efforts are also important, in fact it matter a lot to have a global community well aware of the magnitude of the threats which is upon us. Thus, world celebrities on different fields (fashion, sport, global media, movies),make a strong contribution on this regards. So, they are very welcome.
The key question though is: What are the incentives for ordinary citizens to follow such impulse?.The first and obvious one, is admiration of what those celebrities are capable of. Unfortunately, it is not enough , and it is necessary to consider more direct incentives for ordinary citizens .
Economics teach precisely that: Incentives moves people decisions, to get their highest welfare level. It is well known that there are already alternatives both for firms and individuals to use better and more friendly environment source of energy. Green bonus, is a market mechanism to induce firms a more active role to protect environment, in this case based on profit they can get for not contaminate. But is it enough?.These days, tax deductions should be applied taking into account, the kind of policy firms have toward environment protection. On the other side, Individual also needs those kind of incentives .Let consider the case of a family who want to have their house with solar energy panels. What do they get in return?.Sure lower energy bills, but do they get a tax deduction on other expenses ,because the energy they are saving means supporting environment protection?.Therefore, taxes as an incentive for growth ,should be planned to do so, considering environment as a key variable, as a fist step to get sustainable growth .-
Friday, June 06, 2008
Fiscal Policy Efficiency in Latin America (II)
Is it the State some how the enemy of well being of society?, or is it the case that the State ,has been capture by special interest groups ?.Who are these groups? Politicians?, public management staff who serve their own interest, rather than those of the one they should be serving? .These questions, are at the core of the issue of efficiency of fiscal policy.
Let give more attention to it. Fiscal policy is political by nature, it deals with Government ability to pursue the improving of welfare at society level, which is evaluated depending upon the type of preferences voters have, about checking out what the Government is doing. Some countries, evaluate that performance every four years, while others do every six years. However, it looks like such a period of time is too long to have the sense of control fiscal policy need. Therefore, the first issue to improve the efficiency of fiscal policy, deals with better and more often participation of voters, (decentralization),or better control mechanisms ,to avoid both the fiscal resources to be captured (for instance too many organism doing the same and trying to get the same objective), or the worst of the inefficiency about fiscal policy: Corruption.
A recent Corruption index 2008 survey ,done in Chile by the Freedom and Development Institute, shows that the highest level of corruption is found at the government organisms level. On top of the list are Municipalities (5,7)and public firms(6,0).Next are the Justice system, and different Ministry (5,1),closing the list are regional governments (5,0).Besides 50% of those executives included on the poll (411),thinks that corruption is higher now than last year. It follows, that fiscal policy inefficiency seems to be explained by the purpose deviation about its nature,done by those groups who capture teh State for their own interest .
A second issue to improve fiscal policy efficiency, is related to up grade the academic credential of those in charge of public management, along with a modernization of the public management practices. This means to change the political profile of public management, for a professional one. Additional progress on this matter in Chile, has not been fast enough,although the number of executives selected by political preferences has been decreasing, in favor of those based upon professional credentials.-
Let give more attention to it. Fiscal policy is political by nature, it deals with Government ability to pursue the improving of welfare at society level, which is evaluated depending upon the type of preferences voters have, about checking out what the Government is doing. Some countries, evaluate that performance every four years, while others do every six years. However, it looks like such a period of time is too long to have the sense of control fiscal policy need. Therefore, the first issue to improve the efficiency of fiscal policy, deals with better and more often participation of voters, (decentralization),or better control mechanisms ,to avoid both the fiscal resources to be captured (for instance too many organism doing the same and trying to get the same objective), or the worst of the inefficiency about fiscal policy: Corruption.
A recent Corruption index 2008 survey ,done in Chile by the Freedom and Development Institute, shows that the highest level of corruption is found at the government organisms level. On top of the list are Municipalities (5,7)and public firms(6,0).Next are the Justice system, and different Ministry (5,1),closing the list are regional governments (5,0).Besides 50% of those executives included on the poll (411),thinks that corruption is higher now than last year. It follows, that fiscal policy inefficiency seems to be explained by the purpose deviation about its nature,done by those groups who capture teh State for their own interest .
A second issue to improve fiscal policy efficiency, is related to up grade the academic credential of those in charge of public management, along with a modernization of the public management practices. This means to change the political profile of public management, for a professional one. Additional progress on this matter in Chile, has not been fast enough,although the number of executives selected by political preferences has been decreasing, in favor of those based upon professional credentials.-
Friday, May 16, 2008
Fiscal policy efficiency in Latin America (I)
According to Latin America economic outlook 2008,tax and transfers reduce inequality by 15 Gini points in OECD countries while in Latin America, it reduces the equivalent of just 2 gini points. On the other side, fiscal induced reduction in inequality is eight time smaller in Latin America than in Europe. These are some of the key ideas mentioned recently in an article signed by Javier Santiso and Pablo Zoido, in the magazine The Globalist.(April 2008)-
To give a better insight of the issue let considers some additional statistics, (www.emol.com ,Pablo Oregon 2008) Buenos Aires with 14 millions of inhabitants has 365000 public employees , whereas New York wit almost 20 million of inhabitants has 270000 public employees .Argentina as a whole has 1,5 million of public employees, Chile has 185000 public employees . Google (our boss in this blog),does not need more than 11000 to run such a giant internet services provider.
The efficiency of fiscal policy ,is undermined because of the level of rent it needs to collect ,just to support those who have captured the state for their own purposes. Thus, Brazil with a tax burden of 37% as a share of GDP, has currently a public sector which is increasing at a faster speed than ever ( more than a thousand a month) . Therefore very much of those taxes, are not designed to solve social problems, but to finance the new bureaucracy which has nothing to do with the effectiveness of any policy design. In fact Mexico with a tax burden of 15% as a share o GDP, has the same low level as Brazil in some key social indicators. It follows that perhaps half of tax collection in Brazil, is just to finance bureaucracy.
Tax collection is not the only variable on the equation to solve poverty and inequality. It is also important the efficiency of social programs which requires to be better focused ,but also better complement by a staff capable of doing their jobs with low transaction cost (it means low bureaucracy level).The state has become so relevant to provide public employment, that it has distorted its real meaning , which is to support those who are in danger of being left behind, not to providing them exclusively with assistance, but with the proper tools to overcome their constraints with creativity, imagination, self assurance.
To give a better insight of the issue let considers some additional statistics, (www.emol.com ,Pablo Oregon 2008) Buenos Aires with 14 millions of inhabitants has 365000 public employees , whereas New York wit almost 20 million of inhabitants has 270000 public employees .Argentina as a whole has 1,5 million of public employees, Chile has 185000 public employees . Google (our boss in this blog),does not need more than 11000 to run such a giant internet services provider.
The efficiency of fiscal policy ,is undermined because of the level of rent it needs to collect ,just to support those who have captured the state for their own purposes. Thus, Brazil with a tax burden of 37% as a share of GDP, has currently a public sector which is increasing at a faster speed than ever ( more than a thousand a month) . Therefore very much of those taxes, are not designed to solve social problems, but to finance the new bureaucracy which has nothing to do with the effectiveness of any policy design. In fact Mexico with a tax burden of 15% as a share o GDP, has the same low level as Brazil in some key social indicators. It follows that perhaps half of tax collection in Brazil, is just to finance bureaucracy.
Tax collection is not the only variable on the equation to solve poverty and inequality. It is also important the efficiency of social programs which requires to be better focused ,but also better complement by a staff capable of doing their jobs with low transaction cost (it means low bureaucracy level).The state has become so relevant to provide public employment, that it has distorted its real meaning , which is to support those who are in danger of being left behind, not to providing them exclusively with assistance, but with the proper tools to overcome their constraints with creativity, imagination, self assurance.
Friday, May 09, 2008
Labor day: Time for a reflection (II)
Between the years 1990 -2000, wages increased faster in high skilled occupations, than low skilled occupations. Therefore there is a widening gap between those two labour skill segment with further implications, such as increasing inequality, higher pressure on educational system to improve its ability to respond to labour market requirements, and social tensions between the winners and losers of globalization .-
On the other hand, free trade agreements make capital good, relatively cheaper than labour services, inducing both capital-labour substitution, and deepening the higher skilled labour demand. New technologies are knowledge intensive.
Thus, a side effect of these free trade agreement should a higher productivity level, but higher risk of greater inequality if the proper policies to improve labour skills are not implemented . More so, if we take into account the fact that low wage economies do not necessarily mean a threat to high wage economy ,precisely because the productivity gap associated to skill differential, therefore it is not easy to correct the wage imbalance throughout global market forces.-
A complementary approach ,could be to focus the attention upon the services sector ,and its job creation prospect, assuming that its skill requirement are not too high, compared to the capital intensive sector. In both western Europe and North America, the services sector has experienced the most robust growth ,both in terms of value added and employment. Between 1991 and 2003,for every 1% percentage point of growth in the services sector, employment increased by 0,57% in North America and 0,67% (Global Policy forum, KILM report 2005),in Europe ,which reinforce the labour intensive technology used in services activities, or at least the complementary nature of labour and services activities.-
Women are improving its share of labour participation, getting close to that one of men, although this does not mean women can get to the same jobs - equal wage, mechanism .There is still a wage gap between men and women, which might not be solve in the short run. However, new technologies available will make its way to reduce that gap, as it allows women to compensate time spend at home, using her own firms internal networks support ,to keep the paced with her jobs.-
On the other hand, free trade agreements make capital good, relatively cheaper than labour services, inducing both capital-labour substitution, and deepening the higher skilled labour demand. New technologies are knowledge intensive.
Thus, a side effect of these free trade agreement should a higher productivity level, but higher risk of greater inequality if the proper policies to improve labour skills are not implemented . More so, if we take into account the fact that low wage economies do not necessarily mean a threat to high wage economy ,precisely because the productivity gap associated to skill differential, therefore it is not easy to correct the wage imbalance throughout global market forces.-
A complementary approach ,could be to focus the attention upon the services sector ,and its job creation prospect, assuming that its skill requirement are not too high, compared to the capital intensive sector. In both western Europe and North America, the services sector has experienced the most robust growth ,both in terms of value added and employment. Between 1991 and 2003,for every 1% percentage point of growth in the services sector, employment increased by 0,57% in North America and 0,67% (Global Policy forum, KILM report 2005),in Europe ,which reinforce the labour intensive technology used in services activities, or at least the complementary nature of labour and services activities.-
Women are improving its share of labour participation, getting close to that one of men, although this does not mean women can get to the same jobs - equal wage, mechanism .There is still a wage gap between men and women, which might not be solve in the short run. However, new technologies available will make its way to reduce that gap, as it allows women to compensate time spend at home, using her own firms internal networks support ,to keep the paced with her jobs.-
Friday, May 02, 2008
Labour day : Time for a reflection (I)
What is the meaning of labour day , in the XXI century?: Well, perhaps May the 1st, means much more today than it has been usual to think about . Globalization has been mainly driven by capital accumulation, which seek lower cost to get higher capital return. The economic foundation of the globalization process is quite clear ,as it is the fact that the necessary complementary labour skills have also changed. More and better qualified skill, are necessary to get a better share of global income growth. The problem is that these skills do not increase at the same pace, to improve labour share, as it does capital productivity in production process. On the other side, lower skills, imply lower labour productivity and lower wage.
The overall picture looks worrisome. The Global Policy Forum and its key indicators of the labour market (KILM- 2005) says that :“half the world´s workers still do not earn enough to lift themselves and their families above the U$$ 2 a day poverty line”. Besides the report says for million of workers, new jobs often provide barely enough income to lift them above poverty line, or are far below any adequate measure of satisfying and productive work. In fact ,almost 50% of global employment (1,38 billion people),down from 57% in 1994 ,live on less than U$$2 a day. This means that although employment might increase, the quality of those new jobs is far below the acceptable. Low productivity Women and men, are working long and hard, for very little because their only alternative is to have no income at all (KILM report 2005).-
Employment and economic growth relationship, has also changed to reflect what it looks like to be, the capital intensive nature of globalization. For every percentage point of additional GDP growth, total global employment has grown by only 0,30 percentage point between 1999 and 2003,a drop from 0,38 percentage points between 1995 -1999. Moreover between 1990-2000,wages increased globally faster in high skilled occupations, than in low-skilled occupations . Therefore the challenge of our time, is to solve the productivity gap, which arise among others reasons, because lack of good education, centralized state which creates a culture based on social assistance, rather than individual effort, which deteriorates the key potential for growth, creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship.-
The overall picture looks worrisome. The Global Policy Forum and its key indicators of the labour market (KILM- 2005) says that :“half the world´s workers still do not earn enough to lift themselves and their families above the U$$ 2 a day poverty line”. Besides the report says for million of workers, new jobs often provide barely enough income to lift them above poverty line, or are far below any adequate measure of satisfying and productive work. In fact ,almost 50% of global employment (1,38 billion people),down from 57% in 1994 ,live on less than U$$2 a day. This means that although employment might increase, the quality of those new jobs is far below the acceptable. Low productivity Women and men, are working long and hard, for very little because their only alternative is to have no income at all (KILM report 2005).-
Employment and economic growth relationship, has also changed to reflect what it looks like to be, the capital intensive nature of globalization. For every percentage point of additional GDP growth, total global employment has grown by only 0,30 percentage point between 1999 and 2003,a drop from 0,38 percentage points between 1995 -1999. Moreover between 1990-2000,wages increased globally faster in high skilled occupations, than in low-skilled occupations . Therefore the challenge of our time, is to solve the productivity gap, which arise among others reasons, because lack of good education, centralized state which creates a culture based on social assistance, rather than individual effort, which deteriorates the key potential for growth, creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship.-
Friday, April 11, 2008
Supply side economics : An overview (II)
It is true that lower taxes reduces the incentives(benefit) of not paying them, which imply that tax payers have to pay higher cost for not paying lower taxes. As a result tax revenues increases because of better tax compliance. However, the question whether lower taxes really means increases in tax revenue , also becomes a practical matter concerning the management technology , the IRS or for this matter any tax authority, apply to the process of tax revenue collection. The better the technology support on management, applied to collect taxes, the higher should be tax revenues. Neither Laffer, nor Paap and Takats paper (IMF WP 8/07), give too much importance to such issue(technology and tax collection). In fact Paap´ s paper, works on the assumption that there is limited enforcement capacity , and auditing for tax payers randomly determined .-
The conclusion of that paper though, make clear the point about the ability of tax authorities to get tax payers on line, such that those cases with weak tax collection system, might benefit more from tax cuts than those with strong tax collection system. But there is no mention about technology applied on tax collection, let say throughout a transaction networks, which automatically get the proper tax with each transaction.-
The question about the real impact of lower taxes on economic growth, and the expected higher productivity level arising from private uses of resources , will also depend on the institutional framework ,which means that tax cut , requires complementary policies to get the best of its effect on welfare.-
Tax cuts might have a stronger impact on economic growth, when they are complemented with better incentives to tax exemption , better service for tax payers (customer profit approach ), and better allocation decisions for fewer resources , which should be focused on those areas with the stronger impact on growth.Tax cuts on its own, is just the minimum of the economic growth- incentives , equation.-
The conclusion of that paper though, make clear the point about the ability of tax authorities to get tax payers on line, such that those cases with weak tax collection system, might benefit more from tax cuts than those with strong tax collection system. But there is no mention about technology applied on tax collection, let say throughout a transaction networks, which automatically get the proper tax with each transaction.-
The question about the real impact of lower taxes on economic growth, and the expected higher productivity level arising from private uses of resources , will also depend on the institutional framework ,which means that tax cut , requires complementary policies to get the best of its effect on welfare.-
Tax cuts might have a stronger impact on economic growth, when they are complemented with better incentives to tax exemption , better service for tax payers (customer profit approach ), and better allocation decisions for fewer resources , which should be focused on those areas with the stronger impact on growth.Tax cuts on its own, is just the minimum of the economic growth- incentives , equation.-
Friday, April 04, 2008
Supply side economics : An overview (I)
Supply side economics although controversial , it was supposedly to be a key development on macroeconomic policy design .Was it so ?. Most of the policies analysis and applications in the second half of the twenty century, has been a kind of solving aggregate demand problems. Keynes, Friedman, Tobin, among others XX th century economist, were all aggregate demand economist. The first two, focusing on the fiscal policy and monetary policy side respectively, of the problem. Tobin with his income policy approach, making supply side engineering.-
In the early eighties, following rational expectations macroeconomic revolution, came out Supply side economics as an alternative explanation for economic growth and market behaviour . The book “Wealth and Poverty” , (1983) by George Wilder, made popular the notion of markets driven by supply forces , as much as demand ones.
One of Its key arguments ,was about the importance of tax policies to modify incentives in the decision making process, specially labor supply and investment decision. Although there is evidence about the positive impact that lower taxes have upon economic growth in the long run (World Bank papers) ,there is not too much consensus about its short run implications .A recent paper (IMF, WP 08/7 Thomas Paap and Elòd Takâts :Tax rate cuts and tax compliance :The Laffer curve revisited, January 2008),analyzes how tax rate cuts can increase revenues. It apply the argument to Russia tax policy which cut income tax to a flat 13%, replacing a tier tax model of 12,20 and 30% previous rate. Tax exemption increases, reduced further down the tax burden. So, Personal income tax revenues grew by 46% in nominal terms , and 26% in real terms during the following year. Besides, Personal income tax(PIT) share to the GDP, increased from 2,4% up to 3,3%.Maybe it is not enough and conclusive empirical evidence, but it suggest some guidelines about microeconomic side of tax policies effects.- However, Supply side economics foundations; goes deeper than tax cuts. It says that private allocations of financial resources, get higher productivity than public allocation (Government) of the same resources, because the opportunity cost are different: Higher for the private than the public sector. Having said that, tax cuts might or might not increase revenues, because families and firms have different views about what the highest productivity of their financial resources are .Families and individuals, might save the additional resource into their pockets, such that the final impact on tax revenues, will depend upon the tax applying on saving .Business might decide to invest more, but the effect of additional investment on tax revenues ,will depend on where that investment goes to.
In the early eighties, following rational expectations macroeconomic revolution, came out Supply side economics as an alternative explanation for economic growth and market behaviour . The book “Wealth and Poverty” , (1983) by George Wilder, made popular the notion of markets driven by supply forces , as much as demand ones.
One of Its key arguments ,was about the importance of tax policies to modify incentives in the decision making process, specially labor supply and investment decision. Although there is evidence about the positive impact that lower taxes have upon economic growth in the long run (World Bank papers) ,there is not too much consensus about its short run implications .A recent paper (IMF, WP 08/7 Thomas Paap and Elòd Takâts :Tax rate cuts and tax compliance :The Laffer curve revisited, January 2008),analyzes how tax rate cuts can increase revenues. It apply the argument to Russia tax policy which cut income tax to a flat 13%, replacing a tier tax model of 12,20 and 30% previous rate. Tax exemption increases, reduced further down the tax burden. So, Personal income tax revenues grew by 46% in nominal terms , and 26% in real terms during the following year. Besides, Personal income tax(PIT) share to the GDP, increased from 2,4% up to 3,3%.Maybe it is not enough and conclusive empirical evidence, but it suggest some guidelines about microeconomic side of tax policies effects.- However, Supply side economics foundations; goes deeper than tax cuts. It says that private allocations of financial resources, get higher productivity than public allocation (Government) of the same resources, because the opportunity cost are different: Higher for the private than the public sector. Having said that, tax cuts might or might not increase revenues, because families and firms have different views about what the highest productivity of their financial resources are .Families and individuals, might save the additional resource into their pockets, such that the final impact on tax revenues, will depend upon the tax applying on saving .Business might decide to invest more, but the effect of additional investment on tax revenues ,will depend on where that investment goes to.
Friday, March 28, 2008
The economics of internet (II)
Internet is expected to have a lasting impact on society, but we still do not know the full strength of it. However, one thing for sure is that any way to limit its effect, will means costs higher than the benefit. Let analyze this assessment in more details. So far, both global society (global village) and global economies seems to move, pretty much up to the pace internet has settled, in terms of information flows, communication channel, and transaction facilities. With TV soon placed massively on internet, conventional TV will become not just global, but instantaneous and so it will its influence. Therefore ,any attempt to restraint this dynamic looks like trying to stop the unstoppable, in what it is an useless effort .The rate of increase of internet users is more than 100%.
Ronald Coase said some years ago (1971), that the market for ideas, is not that much different than the markets for goods, such that both are accountable for regulation. The implication was that as long as there was regulation for imperfect competition ,so it was necessary to apply regulation in the markets for ideas. But how can be possible to apply such regulation ,to what has become a global multimedia source of new ideas?. Society needs all the information available to make the best decisions about different issues concerning their welfare level increase. For example, if had not been by internet , the environment damage caused by human intervention, would not have gone so far other than the daily news ,which means that the global warming issue would not have been more than a debatable topic for scientist and expert on climate change. Internet has made it not only a debatable topic , but also a priority because every one connected to this network has the chance to make comments, suggestion , critic and evaluations ;pressing the world organizations dealing with it, to pursue a more active role. As a matter of fact ,this year there are planned more than 26 conferences related to the global warming issue, all of them possible to track by internet. Physically it is impossible for anyone to attend them all , however internet allow to all who want to participates to register on line. On the other side, there are a global community worried about the environment, based upon internet facilities, which made possible for the year 2007 ,to become the year of the environment. Thus, because society has better information, key element to develop a deeper consciousness about the complexity of such challenge, these days the environment issue is on top of the agenda , and the expectations are to make further progress into the near future. In short ,in just a few years it has been possible to move forward on the environment dilemma, at a faster pace than in the previous decade .On the other side, information flows allow the global economy a quicker response and adjustment to random shocks at lower cost than otherwise. Any restriction on these flows, would mean welfare cost for global community.-
Blogging is the new wave of internet communication. More than 30 million of them live in the cyberspace, and it will become more relevant in the near future ,as each one person´ s point of view will matter in a more fractionated global society. The willingness to reach out other people, exceeds any attempt to impose limits and control . Chile has been working very actively on the internet platform for public services(education, health), privates firms, services,(financial, job seeking opportunities), and news media (comments segment),in what it looks increasingly like a virtual society although. with real effects. It is one of the leading countries in Latin America on this issue. However, while most of Latin America newspapers, have been moving forward to allow their readers a broader space to shape public opinion, some Chilean news papers seems to restrain their connectivity with its readers.
Ronald Coase said some years ago (1971), that the market for ideas, is not that much different than the markets for goods, such that both are accountable for regulation. The implication was that as long as there was regulation for imperfect competition ,so it was necessary to apply regulation in the markets for ideas. But how can be possible to apply such regulation ,to what has become a global multimedia source of new ideas?. Society needs all the information available to make the best decisions about different issues concerning their welfare level increase. For example, if had not been by internet , the environment damage caused by human intervention, would not have gone so far other than the daily news ,which means that the global warming issue would not have been more than a debatable topic for scientist and expert on climate change. Internet has made it not only a debatable topic , but also a priority because every one connected to this network has the chance to make comments, suggestion , critic and evaluations ;pressing the world organizations dealing with it, to pursue a more active role. As a matter of fact ,this year there are planned more than 26 conferences related to the global warming issue, all of them possible to track by internet. Physically it is impossible for anyone to attend them all , however internet allow to all who want to participates to register on line. On the other side, there are a global community worried about the environment, based upon internet facilities, which made possible for the year 2007 ,to become the year of the environment. Thus, because society has better information, key element to develop a deeper consciousness about the complexity of such challenge, these days the environment issue is on top of the agenda , and the expectations are to make further progress into the near future. In short ,in just a few years it has been possible to move forward on the environment dilemma, at a faster pace than in the previous decade .On the other side, information flows allow the global economy a quicker response and adjustment to random shocks at lower cost than otherwise. Any restriction on these flows, would mean welfare cost for global community.-
Blogging is the new wave of internet communication. More than 30 million of them live in the cyberspace, and it will become more relevant in the near future ,as each one person´ s point of view will matter in a more fractionated global society. The willingness to reach out other people, exceeds any attempt to impose limits and control . Chile has been working very actively on the internet platform for public services(education, health), privates firms, services,(financial, job seeking opportunities), and news media (comments segment),in what it looks increasingly like a virtual society although. with real effects. It is one of the leading countries in Latin America on this issue. However, while most of Latin America newspapers, have been moving forward to allow their readers a broader space to shape public opinion, some Chilean news papers seems to restrain their connectivity with its readers.
Friday, March 14, 2008
The economics of internet (I)
Since it was widely available for world audience a few years ago, internet has had a deep impact on the way of life around the world ,such that it is not possible to assume a situation without it. How can that impact be explained?. Internet is a communication revolution which allow people to be themselves, to speak out their fears and hopes to a world audience with no real involvement, because it is all virtual, therefore it is all imagination in real time, but it looks like real, and its implications are real. On the other side, it is its impact on transaction cost which has a deep effect on a variety of daily events, more so with the new tecnological development(video, voice, images applications) which make its effect more relevant .
Transaction cost represent a constraint not just for commercial transaction purposes , but also for research requirements in terms of both data gathering and analysis. Throughout internet, any researcher might go virtually any place in the world to get the material or data he or she needs, in a way which is impossible to do otherwise. Imagine a flight to the New York Public library, or for that matter to the NYU or Columbia Universities libraries,just to to check some articles, concerning for instance the impact of environment damages, on global economy. Internet induces an exponential increase in knowledge.
For commercial purposes, it facilitates the commercial transaction and decision making process, reducing the time requirement to get it done. Global Corporations ,are connected into global commercial networks which allows them to get quick access ( saving up to two a more weeks )to the best available alternative to buy any of their inputs , supporting more efficiently the production chain with the “just in time scheme”, and allowing important gains in competitiveness. Because it allows companies a better insight about the markets forces trends and expectations they deal with , it improves efficiency in the management decision process as well.
Far beyond global TV impact ,Internet has made the world a smaller place, because it is faster , in fact it is instantaneous. Besides it is available on the computer screen of everyone , reducing any world event to something “usual” and “closer” which "share space" with your own daily stuff. Moreover, it has concentrated both the past and the future into one single observation through simulation. In short, only the present matter, because has become the connecting point between the past and the future. The uncertainty is about the unexpected event, out of the boundaries, not necessarily about the future itself because somehow we have it already with us in our computer screen!.
There is no other revolution of such magnitude in human history , and beware that we are still away from its limits. Having said that, the next question is this ¿why could anyone cut this flow of communication, information and data exchanges? .Internet means improving welfare level at a global scale ,so it improves welfare levels to a smaller scale as well. It means a global democracy, where an opportunity create more opportunities for others. It allow citizen to evaluate government performance on public issues , improving the effectiveness of public polices.-
It follows that any restriction about this flow of information, would be equivalent to freezing time, while it keep rolling on outside the freezing area anyway . In other word , is like keeping fixed our own clock, while others ´s one , continues moving. -
Transaction cost represent a constraint not just for commercial transaction purposes , but also for research requirements in terms of both data gathering and analysis. Throughout internet, any researcher might go virtually any place in the world to get the material or data he or she needs, in a way which is impossible to do otherwise. Imagine a flight to the New York Public library, or for that matter to the NYU or Columbia Universities libraries,just to to check some articles, concerning for instance the impact of environment damages, on global economy. Internet induces an exponential increase in knowledge.
For commercial purposes, it facilitates the commercial transaction and decision making process, reducing the time requirement to get it done. Global Corporations ,are connected into global commercial networks which allows them to get quick access ( saving up to two a more weeks )to the best available alternative to buy any of their inputs , supporting more efficiently the production chain with the “just in time scheme”, and allowing important gains in competitiveness. Because it allows companies a better insight about the markets forces trends and expectations they deal with , it improves efficiency in the management decision process as well.
Far beyond global TV impact ,Internet has made the world a smaller place, because it is faster , in fact it is instantaneous. Besides it is available on the computer screen of everyone , reducing any world event to something “usual” and “closer” which "share space" with your own daily stuff. Moreover, it has concentrated both the past and the future into one single observation through simulation. In short, only the present matter, because has become the connecting point between the past and the future. The uncertainty is about the unexpected event, out of the boundaries, not necessarily about the future itself because somehow we have it already with us in our computer screen!.
There is no other revolution of such magnitude in human history , and beware that we are still away from its limits. Having said that, the next question is this ¿why could anyone cut this flow of communication, information and data exchanges? .Internet means improving welfare level at a global scale ,so it improves welfare levels to a smaller scale as well. It means a global democracy, where an opportunity create more opportunities for others. It allow citizen to evaluate government performance on public issues , improving the effectiveness of public polices.-
It follows that any restriction about this flow of information, would be equivalent to freezing time, while it keep rolling on outside the freezing area anyway . In other word , is like keeping fixed our own clock, while others ´s one , continues moving. -
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Friday, March 07, 2008
The next decade Dilemma for Latin America economies:Distribution or growth
After the nineties most of the Latin America countries, followed a turn to the left, probably searching a new path more socially inclusive to guarantee Governance and democratic stability,not necessarily because of markets failure but more so because of lack of adjustment in the instituional framework to allow markets to work properly.
Governance and social inclusion are legitimate objective which come out not only from the left, but also from the right( Compassionate Conservative approach). The difference lies upon the means to achieve it. While the Latin America left, quite differently to their moderate European counterparts, believe in distributive policies based on more taxes, subsidies, and regulations, in short a bigger State to get better living conditions, the moderate right believes in the ability of individual choices throughout markets both based and within the proper institutional framework, to get such objectives. Given the fact that leftist Government in the majority of the cases, have followed the traditional old fashioned paradigm of trying to replace markets instead of cooperate actively with it, few countries like Brazil, Peru, Uruguay ,and Chile arise like the pragmatic exceptions, to counterweigh the more ideological approach of other Latin America economies. But Chile´s experience of focusing too much on distribution, is currently showing its limitations as well, because of the negative impact on the rate of economic growth.(This year, with copper price above U$$4,02 lb, the Chilean economy is expected to growth at annual rate of 4 -4.5%,half the average rate of the nineties).-
Thus, the dilemma for the next decade is already settled down: Latin America must decide the proper economic path to improve its living standard. Distribution based on the State means more poverty, because the State is political by nature, which means that Social problems like poverty and inequality, are constrained to political realities,(poor people can wait the next election), and it is not in the State ´s interest to solve it other than to save face. The link between the State privileges, political interest and power concentration on those who run the State, mean that they need “customers” to survive. Therefore,without any reforms on the colonial State, the real path is to focus on growth , free trade agreements with the new arising markets and more flexible approach to private initiative.
Governance and social inclusion are legitimate objective which come out not only from the left, but also from the right( Compassionate Conservative approach). The difference lies upon the means to achieve it. While the Latin America left, quite differently to their moderate European counterparts, believe in distributive policies based on more taxes, subsidies, and regulations, in short a bigger State to get better living conditions, the moderate right believes in the ability of individual choices throughout markets both based and within the proper institutional framework, to get such objectives. Given the fact that leftist Government in the majority of the cases, have followed the traditional old fashioned paradigm of trying to replace markets instead of cooperate actively with it, few countries like Brazil, Peru, Uruguay ,and Chile arise like the pragmatic exceptions, to counterweigh the more ideological approach of other Latin America economies. But Chile´s experience of focusing too much on distribution, is currently showing its limitations as well, because of the negative impact on the rate of economic growth.(This year, with copper price above U$$4,02 lb, the Chilean economy is expected to growth at annual rate of 4 -4.5%,half the average rate of the nineties).-
Thus, the dilemma for the next decade is already settled down: Latin America must decide the proper economic path to improve its living standard. Distribution based on the State means more poverty, because the State is political by nature, which means that Social problems like poverty and inequality, are constrained to political realities,(poor people can wait the next election), and it is not in the State ´s interest to solve it other than to save face. The link between the State privileges, political interest and power concentration on those who run the State, mean that they need “customers” to survive. Therefore,without any reforms on the colonial State, the real path is to focus on growth , free trade agreements with the new arising markets and more flexible approach to private initiative.
Friday, February 29, 2008
Politics and Economics In Latin America:The 2000 years experience (II)
It seemed like everything changed, to keep everything as usual. The State is still considered to be the champion of social welfare and protection. It has kept for itself the monopoly of such values, applying high entry barriers to private sector in case they want to go into those areas. Let take some examples, Public health infrastructure, public transportation (subways),and Education are considered as the “natural“ business of the State .The nature of public goods of such services however, reinforce such notion, given the wrong impression that there is a first best alternative(the state), for good institutional framework, to let markets and the private firms works properly. Chilean experience shows that it is not necessarily the case. Huge amount of money poured since early nineties, into education and public health, have not improved the system, or even worse have not improved its quality at all.
It fallows that to correct market failures, does not imply that public sector by itself will do the job better. At least, not within its current institutional format.
Thus, the reforms done in the nineties, did not ventured deep enough into the roots of most of economic and social problem in Latin America: State intervention in the economy, and those who carried them out, which were also in charge of running the State: politicians, bureaucracy managers, and special interest groups(Labor unions). They protected their own business with a self constrained reform!.Business man, intermediate business associations, regional leaders, intellectuals ,were left out of the process.
Why they did so?. One Hypothesis could be that because they believe their own values, are better that those arising from individual preferences and freedom of choice. A second hypothesis, could be that they depend upon the State protection and privileges, specially the political parties , such that they no longer could afford any substantial self reinforce reform of the State based on decentralization, as part of such process.
It fallows that to correct market failures, does not imply that public sector by itself will do the job better. At least, not within its current institutional format.
Thus, the reforms done in the nineties, did not ventured deep enough into the roots of most of economic and social problem in Latin America: State intervention in the economy, and those who carried them out, which were also in charge of running the State: politicians, bureaucracy managers, and special interest groups(Labor unions). They protected their own business with a self constrained reform!.Business man, intermediate business associations, regional leaders, intellectuals ,were left out of the process.
Why they did so?. One Hypothesis could be that because they believe their own values, are better that those arising from individual preferences and freedom of choice. A second hypothesis, could be that they depend upon the State protection and privileges, specially the political parties , such that they no longer could afford any substantial self reinforce reform of the State based on decentralization, as part of such process.
Friday, February 22, 2008
Politics and Economics in Latin America:The 2000 years experience (I)
Where Latin America economies are headed to these days ?.This question seems quite relevant after the adjustment process following the eighties lost decade, and the subsequent “Washington Consensus Policies” in the nineties. It looked like the “new economy” finally arrived to Latin America, so it was the expectations with Argentina, Brazil even Venezuela after its own experience with the effect of expansive fiscal policies following oil export income increases, in the seventies. Thus, with the first decade of the XXI century closer to the end , and beyond the favorable current situation with higher commodities prices, economic analyst, business man and politic leaders, start to wonder what is it next for these economies?.Chile was for quite a while, the reference to work out the new path. Market orientated economic policies, complementary role of the State , flexible regulatory framework, and stable macroeconomic policies and reliable institutions, seemed to be the first best approach. Unfortunately, there has not been that much sense of a leadership purpose ,in this successful experience. In fact, actually ,Chile looks somehow isolated within Latin America, trying its own economic path, which by the way, is the one (supported with further microeconomic reforms),upon which sustainable welfare levels increases are feasible .
However ,the fact of the matter is that most of the key Latin American economies, still rely on the State to pursue economic development. Argentina and its new Government first 100 days, seems to validate the traditional State intervention paradigm. Private sector depends on the state policies for transport infrastructure, urban development, macroeconomic policies design(inflation is controlled throughout special agreement with private sector).Refreshing views about either a modern more efficient State, or stronger private sector role in the economy, are out of the daily debate. So it is in Brazil, and Venezuela, although with different degrees. Brazilians authorities, have been far more pragmatic, than their ideological counterparts. They have followed a moderate approach, and as a result President Lula ´s support, is among the highest in the region,because of the results in terms of growth and poverty reduction.
However ,the fact of the matter is that most of the key Latin American economies, still rely on the State to pursue economic development. Argentina and its new Government first 100 days, seems to validate the traditional State intervention paradigm. Private sector depends on the state policies for transport infrastructure, urban development, macroeconomic policies design(inflation is controlled throughout special agreement with private sector).Refreshing views about either a modern more efficient State, or stronger private sector role in the economy, are out of the daily debate. So it is in Brazil, and Venezuela, although with different degrees. Brazilians authorities, have been far more pragmatic, than their ideological counterparts. They have followed a moderate approach, and as a result President Lula ´s support, is among the highest in the region,because of the results in terms of growth and poverty reduction.
Friday, February 08, 2008
New management rules for the CEOS (II)
Wealth creation means the ability to take risk sucessfully , but what are the price of those risks?.Benefits (returns),are the first measure of risks´price . The higher the price(risk) the higher the return .That is Tobin analysis of the relationship between risk and return for an individual investment. A different thing is to manage risks on behalf of others people´s interest, like firms do.
Milton Friedman said in the seventies that the only justification for business is private profit ,which means that firms should ruled out any sense of social compromise , other than with shareholders. From this point of view ,risks are justified upon the ground of seeking short run profit, thus it does not matter the risk price ,whether there is a reasonable chance to get the highest return ,measured at the end of the year accounting balance and dividends . Following this behavior, it is usual to find opposite interest between management and owner. This is so ,because in the process managers get a pay for the results they get, the better the result the better the pay. Therefore ,short run seeking profits decisions, are vulnerable to conflicting interest, more than long run strategies, because in the short run ,CEOS do not have limits other than the expected positive result .If they fail, their retirement bonus will fix it all.
What about a long run strategy?.Any strategy has different and particular support upon which stand,(market share, increase in sales, segmentation, innovations and the like),but no matter its justification, it allow to define a set of values complementary and sometime necessary, to the proper implementation of those strategies .In the long run, social values such as compromise with community , employees and markets stability, match quite well with the profit seeking strategy. This is what empirical evidence shows since the nineties .In other words, Corporate social responsibility fit better than exclusively short run result ,the right combination of management values other than simply to earn money. It follow that the best way to match different interest within firms ,is based on a long run shared view of what each business is about. Profits seeking by itself ,do not guarantee neither stable and sustainable firms growth.-
Milton Friedman said in the seventies that the only justification for business is private profit ,which means that firms should ruled out any sense of social compromise , other than with shareholders. From this point of view ,risks are justified upon the ground of seeking short run profit, thus it does not matter the risk price ,whether there is a reasonable chance to get the highest return ,measured at the end of the year accounting balance and dividends . Following this behavior, it is usual to find opposite interest between management and owner. This is so ,because in the process managers get a pay for the results they get, the better the result the better the pay. Therefore ,short run seeking profits decisions, are vulnerable to conflicting interest, more than long run strategies, because in the short run ,CEOS do not have limits other than the expected positive result .If they fail, their retirement bonus will fix it all.
What about a long run strategy?.Any strategy has different and particular support upon which stand,(market share, increase in sales, segmentation, innovations and the like),but no matter its justification, it allow to define a set of values complementary and sometime necessary, to the proper implementation of those strategies .In the long run, social values such as compromise with community , employees and markets stability, match quite well with the profit seeking strategy. This is what empirical evidence shows since the nineties .In other words, Corporate social responsibility fit better than exclusively short run result ,the right combination of management values other than simply to earn money. It follow that the best way to match different interest within firms ,is based on a long run shared view of what each business is about. Profits seeking by itself ,do not guarantee neither stable and sustainable firms growth.-
Friday, February 01, 2008
New management rules for the CEOS (I)
From the economic point of view, there is a theory(agency theory) within the field of organizational economics ,which explains the opposition between the CEO´s management interest, and those of the shareholders ,employees and community. This is more obvious when it comes to risk management, because in case of failure the burden cost lies upon shareholders and the community (employment losses),but not necessarily in CEO´s pockets, because they might claim their retirement bonus ,unless they face justice to clear up their responsibility, when such a risk turn out to be a business failure.-
On the other side, Management models have tried to deal with this issue, throughout the so called Contract Theory, which says that because firms is so widely considered like a network of different and some times conflicting interests, there is no better way to internally regulate those one, than with the help of contracts. These contracts, might be the kind of either short run or long run periods contracts , depending on its scope and level of application. Thus, on daily operations these contract are the kind of well done job contracts, with penalties for failures (for instance low quality,) and bonus for results achievement (productivity or profit). On the strategic level, (CEO´s field) these contract, are the kind of a long run focused time span, although with strong emphasis on short run financial results, which becomes like the monitoring board, to evaluate the application of strategies .-
Whatever the focus of these contract, the fact is that risk management is hard to assess, mainly because of the nature of new strategies which the CEO´s are responsible for. New strategies implementation, means to undertake risks anyway, thus the question becomes what kind of risks failures are they accountable for?. Risks are within the core of business and wealth creation, therefore too much control about risks, might imply to introduce additional constraints to the whole decision making process, and profit seeking strategies. Double check procedures, and rotating risk involvement decisions among team members instead, within the frameworks of performance contract, seems to be a valuable instrument ,to get the proper equilibrium between those interest linked to short run profit seeking behavior CEO´s job) ,with those linked to its long run sustainability (shareholders ,employees and community ).
On the other side, Management models have tried to deal with this issue, throughout the so called Contract Theory, which says that because firms is so widely considered like a network of different and some times conflicting interests, there is no better way to internally regulate those one, than with the help of contracts. These contracts, might be the kind of either short run or long run periods contracts , depending on its scope and level of application. Thus, on daily operations these contract are the kind of well done job contracts, with penalties for failures (for instance low quality,) and bonus for results achievement (productivity or profit). On the strategic level, (CEO´s field) these contract, are the kind of a long run focused time span, although with strong emphasis on short run financial results, which becomes like the monitoring board, to evaluate the application of strategies .-
Whatever the focus of these contract, the fact is that risk management is hard to assess, mainly because of the nature of new strategies which the CEO´s are responsible for. New strategies implementation, means to undertake risks anyway, thus the question becomes what kind of risks failures are they accountable for?. Risks are within the core of business and wealth creation, therefore too much control about risks, might imply to introduce additional constraints to the whole decision making process, and profit seeking strategies. Double check procedures, and rotating risk involvement decisions among team members instead, within the frameworks of performance contract, seems to be a valuable instrument ,to get the proper equilibrium between those interest linked to short run profit seeking behavior CEO´s job) ,with those linked to its long run sustainability (shareholders ,employees and community ).
Friday, January 25, 2008
Weak dollar hurt Latin America export:Its implications
Most of the Latin America economies exports are highly concentrated on primary products, such as agricultural products (wheat sugar, coffee),mining products (copper, silver) and, few countries export gas and oil within the energy sector. Manufacturers products also are in export supply but they have a smaller share of total export. On the other side,15% of Latin American economies GDP are concentrated on USA markets. It is widely known that the USA economy is under a slowing down process, which means that as long as American income GDP ) decrease, the total demand for Latin Economies export also decrease. Additionally the weak dollar also affect the exporting sector ,because it make more expensive good coming from those economies.
The local currencies of most Latin America economies ,have appreciated not just because of more foreign investment, or incoming capital flows ,but also as a consequence of dollar depreciation.. Thus, the Brazilian real has appreciated by 25% against the dollar, up to October of the year 2007.Brazilian economy though ,is more diversified with its exporting markets.-
According to Latin America Economic Commission, current account balance worsened in 14 out of 19 Latin America economies. Colombia (-3,9% of GDP), Uruguay (-2,6% of its GDP)Mexico (-0,8% of its GDP) .Argentina and Brazil have more diversified its export markets toward Europe ,China and India. In the Argentina case , exports to the USA economy , represent only 0,3% of its GDP , ranked in the third place after South common markets association, and Asian economies.-
The solution is far from an easy implementation, because primary agricultural export got subsidies from European economies which make their prices cheaper than otherwise. It follows that the dilemma for these agricultural exporting economies lies between either high prices because of local currency appreciation ,or low prices , because of subsidies in European markets for some of its primary exports. Therefore these economies are more vulnerable to any change in world economy conditions.
Some sectors of Chilean exports have also been affected by dollar weakness ,although the annual volume for the year 2007 was positive, because of copper export volume ( 60% of total exports),which had a very good price throughout all year. Private Exporters though, have complained about this situation because peso appreciation has led the sectors to important losses of competitiveness. High labour cost, have affected additionally exports performance ,in such a way that world producers like Dole closed its production operation, concentrating itself only in products marketing.-
All of these issue means, that it is important for Latin America economies, to pursue a different and more diversified export strategy, to improve their management model focused on efficiency , productivity and value. All of those exporters (Germany ,Japan , South Korea are good examples) which has made of quality its trade mark, have been able to overcome the cost of its currency appreciation against the dollar.-
The local currencies of most Latin America economies ,have appreciated not just because of more foreign investment, or incoming capital flows ,but also as a consequence of dollar depreciation.. Thus, the Brazilian real has appreciated by 25% against the dollar, up to October of the year 2007.Brazilian economy though ,is more diversified with its exporting markets.-
According to Latin America Economic Commission, current account balance worsened in 14 out of 19 Latin America economies. Colombia (-3,9% of GDP), Uruguay (-2,6% of its GDP)Mexico (-0,8% of its GDP) .Argentina and Brazil have more diversified its export markets toward Europe ,China and India. In the Argentina case , exports to the USA economy , represent only 0,3% of its GDP , ranked in the third place after South common markets association, and Asian economies.-
The solution is far from an easy implementation, because primary agricultural export got subsidies from European economies which make their prices cheaper than otherwise. It follows that the dilemma for these agricultural exporting economies lies between either high prices because of local currency appreciation ,or low prices , because of subsidies in European markets for some of its primary exports. Therefore these economies are more vulnerable to any change in world economy conditions.
Some sectors of Chilean exports have also been affected by dollar weakness ,although the annual volume for the year 2007 was positive, because of copper export volume ( 60% of total exports),which had a very good price throughout all year. Private Exporters though, have complained about this situation because peso appreciation has led the sectors to important losses of competitiveness. High labour cost, have affected additionally exports performance ,in such a way that world producers like Dole closed its production operation, concentrating itself only in products marketing.-
All of these issue means, that it is important for Latin America economies, to pursue a different and more diversified export strategy, to improve their management model focused on efficiency , productivity and value. All of those exporters (Germany ,Japan , South Korea are good examples) which has made of quality its trade mark, have been able to overcome the cost of its currency appreciation against the dollar.-
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)